VSTE
Littera Scripta

ISSN (online): 1805-9112

Open access

AI and Legal Accountability: Rethinking Responsibility in Algorithmic Decision-Making

Marek VOCHOZKA1*iD

  1. Pan-European University, Faculty of Law, Tomášikova 20, 821 02 Bratislava, Slovak Republic

* Corresponding author: vochozka@mail.vstecb.cz

Abstract

Autonomous artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping legal doctrine by blurring the lines of agency and accountability. This study asks two intertwined questions: first, how current liability regimes can be recalibrated to address harms caused by self-learning AI; and second, whether recognizing AI as a limited legal subject offers a viable path to meaningful accountability. Drawing on doctrinal analysis, comparative jurisprudence, and philosophical inquiry, the paper examines the EU AI Act (2024/1689), the EU AI Liability Directive, the GDPR, and parallel developments in U.S. and Canadian law. A systematic survey of many peer-reviewed sources and recent case law reveals persistent regulatory gaps: liability is still funneled through human actors, strict-liability models remain scarce, and key terms such as “autonomous” and “high-risk” lack harmonized definitions. The research highlights new frameworks, such as partial legal capacity (Teilrechtsfähigkeit) and the Robotics/AI Legal Entity (RAiLE), that suggest a hybrid model of AI personhood. However, it finds no jurisdiction willing to grant full legal status to AI. Liability chains often break when AI systems go beyond their original programming. This leaves victims under-protected and developers unsure of their risks. This study ends with incremental, adaptive reforms, stranded in distributed agency, clearer constitutional language, and anticipatory governance, which are critical to defend justice and public confidence as intelligent systems turn more profoundly embedded in social and economic life.

Keywords:Artificial IntelligenceLegal ResponsibilityAlgorithmic AccountabilityAI PersonhoodLiability Frameworks
JEL:K13K20K24

References

  1. Aejas, B., Belhi, A., & Bouras, A. (2025). Using AI to Ensure Reliable Supply Chains: Legal Relation Extraction for Sustainable and Transparent Contract Automation. Sustainability, 17(9), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17094215 DOI: 10.3390/su17094215
  2. Al-Dulaimi, A. O. M., & Mohammed, M. A.-A. W. (2025). Legal responsibility for errors caused by artificial intelligence (AI) in the public sector. International Journal of Law and Management, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). (world). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-08-2024-0295 DOI: 10.1108/IJLMA-08-2024-0295
  3. Ashley, K., & Goldin, I. (2011). Toward AI-enhanced Computer-supported Peer Review in Legal Education. In K. M. Atkinson (Ed.), LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (Vol. 235, pp. 3-+). Ios Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-981-3-3 DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-981-3-3
  4. Asif, M., & Palmirani, M. (2024). Legal Definition Annotation in EU Legislation Using Symbolic AI. In A. Ko, G. Kotsis, A. M. Tjoa, & I. Khalil (Eds.), ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT AND THE INFORMATION SYSTEMS PERSPECTIVE, EGOVIS 2024 (Vol. 14913, pp. 34–39). Springer International Publishing Ag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68211-7_4 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-68211-7_4
  5. Atabekov, A. R. (2020). Ai-Facilitated Interaction Between Man and Robotics: Administrative Legal Capacity Issues. In F. Uslu (Ed.), 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND SOCIAL SCIENCES (INTCESS 2020) (pp. 1118–1122). Int Organization Center Acad Research.
  6. Balan, A. (2024). Examining the ethical and sustainability challenges of legal education’s AI revolution. International Journal of the Legal Profession, 31(3), 323–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2024.2421179 DOI: 10.1080/09695958.2024.2421179
  7. Bayer, J. (2024). Legal implications of using generative AI in the media. INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY LAW, 33(3), 310–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2024.2352694 DOI: 10.1080/13600834.2024.2352694
  8. Becher, S., & Alarie, B. (2025). LexOptima: The promise of AI-enabled legal systems. University of Toronto Law Journal, 75(1), 73–121. https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj-2024-0002 DOI: 10.3138/utlj-2024-0002
  9. Bench-Capon, T. (2022). Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: Editor’s Introduction. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 30(4), 475–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09325-8 DOI: 10.1007/s10506-022-09325-8
  10. Blaszczyk, M. (2025, April 8). Thaler v. Perlmutter: Human Authors at the Center of Copyright? Kluwer Copyright Blog. https://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2025/04/08/thaler-v-perlmutter-human-authors-at-the-center-of-copyright/ DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.5210447
  11. Broman, M. M., & Finckenberg-Broman, P. (2017). Human-Robotics&AI Interaction THE ROBOTICS/AI LEGAL ENTITY (RAiLE©). 2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY (ISTAS), IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society. IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS). DOI: 10.1109/ISTAS.2017.8318980
  12. Castan, C. T. (2024). The legal concept of artificial intelligence: The debate surrounding the definition of AI System in the AI Act. BIOLAW JOURNAL-RIVISTA DI BIODIRITTO, (1), 305–334.
  13. Cheng, L., & Liu, X. (2023). From principles to practices: The intertextual interaction between AI ethical and legal discourses. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL DISCOURSE, 8(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2023-2001 DOI: 10.1515/ijld-2023-2001
  14. Cohen, M. C., Dahan, S., Khern-am-nuai, W., Shimao, H., & Touboul, J. (2023). The use of AI in legal systems: Determining independent contractor vs. employee status. Artificial Intelligence and Law. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-023-09353-y DOI: 10.1007/s10506-023-09353-y
  15. Contini, F., Minissale, A., & Bergman Blix, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence and real decisions: Predictive systems and generative AI vs. emotive-cognitive legal deliberations. Frontiers in Sociology, 9, 1417766. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1417766 DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1417766
  16. Cunningham, J. (2025). Painting in gray: The legal and ethical ambiguities of AI-generated art. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & ETHICS IN SOCIETY, 23(3), 384–391. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-01-2025-0011 DOI: 10.1108/JICES-01-2025-0011
  17. Dahan, S., Bhambhoria, R., Liang, D., & Zhu, X. (2023). OpenJustice.ai: A Global Open-Source Legal Language Model. In J. Spanakis, G. VanDijck, & G. Sileno (Eds.), LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (Vol. 379, pp. 387–390). Ios Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA230995 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4624814
  18. Dahya, R., & Morris, A. (2019). Toward a Conceptual Framework for Understanding AI Action and Legal Reaction. In M. J. Meurs & F. Rudzicz (Eds.), ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (Vol. 11489, pp. 453–459). Springer International Publishing Ag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18305-9_44 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-18305-9_44
  19. Dremliuga, R., Kuznetcov, P., & Mamychev, A. (2019). Criteria for Recognition of AI as a Legal Person. JOURNAL OF POLITICS AND LAW, 12(3), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v12n3p105 DOI: 10.5539/jpl.v12n3p105
  20. El-Farahaty, H. (2025). Integrating Corpora and AI Tools in the Teaching, Learning, and Assessing of Arabic/English Legal Translation. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-025-10281-0 DOI: 10.1007/s11196-025-10281-0
  21. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) – Legal Text. (n.d.). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Retrieved July 5, 2025, from https://gdpr-info.eu/
  22. Giraudo, M., Fosch-Villaronga, E., & Malgieri, G. (2024). Competing Legal Futures—"Commodification Bets" All the Way From Personal Data to AI. GERMAN LAW JOURNAL, 25(7), 1095–1119. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2024.29 DOI: 10.1017/glj.2024.29
  23. Graham, T., Thangavel, K., & Martin, A.-S. (2024). Navigating AI-lien Terrain: Legal liability for artificial intelligence in outer space. ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 217, 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.01.039 DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.01.039
  24. Greenleaf, G., Mowbray, A., & Chung, P. (2019). Legal Information Institutes and AI: Free Access Legal Expertise. In G. Peruginelli & S. Faro (Eds.), KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAW IN THE BIG DATA AGE (Vol. 317, pp. 199–211). Ios Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA190022 DOI: 10.3233/FAIA190022
  25. Greenstein, S. (2022). Preserving the rule of law in the era of artificial intelligence (AI). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAW, 30(3), 291–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-021-09294-4 DOI: 10.1007/s10506-021-09294-4
  26. Hagan, M. (2024). Towards human-centred standards for legal help AI. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 382(2270), 20230157. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2023.0157 DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2023.0157
  27. Ho, J.-H., Lee, G.-G., & Lu, M.-T. (2020). Exploring the Implementation of a Legal AI Bot for Sustainable Development in Legal Advisory Institutions. SUSTAINABILITY, 12(15), 5991. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155991 DOI: 10.3390/su12155991
  28. Jowitt, J. (2021). Assessing contemporary legislative proposals for their compatibility with a natural law case for AI legal personhood. AI & SOCIETY, 36(2), 499–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00979-z DOI: 10.1007/s00146-020-00979-z
  29. Kattnig, M., Angerschmid, A., Reichel, T., & Kern, R. (2024). Assessing trustworthy AI: Technical and legal perspectives of fairness in AI. COMPUTER LAW & SECURITY REVIEW, 55, 106053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106053 DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106053
  30. Kiskis, M. (2023). Legal framework for the coexistence of humans and conscious AI. FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 6, 1205465. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1205465 DOI: 10.3389/frai.2023.1205465
  31. Kostenko, O. M., Bieliakov, K. I., Tykhomyrov, O. O., & Aristova, I. V. (2024). “Legal personality” of artificial intelligence: Methodological problems of scientific reasoning by Ukrainian and EU experts. AI & SOCIETY, 39(4), 1683–1693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01641-0 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-023-01641-0
  32. Kumar, D., & Suthar, N. (2024). Ethical and legal challenges of AI in marketing: An exploration of solutions. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & ETHICS IN SOCIETY, 22(1), 124–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-05-2023-0068 DOI: 10.1108/JICES-05-2023-0068
  33. Laukyte, M. (2019). AI as a Legal Person. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAW, ICAIL 2019, 209–213. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322640.3326701 DOI: 10.1145/3322640.3326701
  34. Lavalle, A., Maté, A., Trujillo, J., & García-Carrasco, J. (2022). Law Modeling for Fairness Requirements Elicitation in Artificial Intelligence Systems. In J. Ralyté, S. Chakravarthy, M. Mohania, M. A. Jeusfeld, & K. Karlapalem (Eds.), Conceptual Modeling (pp. 423–432). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17995-2_30 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-17995-2_30
  35. Li, J., Cai, X., & Cheng, L. (2023). Legal regulation of generative AI: A multidimensional construction. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL DISCOURSE, 8(2), 365–388. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2023-2017 DOI: 10.1515/ijld-2023-2017
  36. Li, W., Song, R., Zhang, B., & Yu, K. (2025). AI creativity and legal protection for AI-generated works in posthuman societal scenarios. Sustainable Futures, 9, 100749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100749 DOI: 10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100749
  37. Lima, G., Cha, M., Jeon, C., & Park, K. S. (2021). The Conflict Between People’s Urge to Punish AI and Legal Systems. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.756242 DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2021.756242
  38. Liu, Y.-H., & Lin, Y.-F. (2024). LASG: Streamlining Legal Adjudication with AI-Enabled Summary Generation. 2024 IEEE 48th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), 2242–2247. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC61105.2024.00360 DOI: 10.1109/COMPSAC61105.2024.00360
  39. Makarov, T. G., Arslanov, K. M., Kobchikova, E. V., Opyhtina, E. G., & Barabanova, S. V. (2022). Legal Aspects of Using Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education. In M. E. Auer, H. Hortsch, O. Michler, & T. Köhler (Eds.), Mobility for Smart Cities and Regional Development—Challenges for Higher Education (pp. 286–295). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93904-5_29 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-93904-5_29
  40. Martfn-Noguerol, T., Lopez-Ubeda, P., & Luna, A. (2024). AI in radiology: Legal responsibilities and the car paradox. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 175, 111462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111462 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111462
  41. Martinho, A. (2025). Surveying Judges about artificial intelligence: Profession, judicial adjudication, and legal principles. AI & SOCIETY, 40(2), 569–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01869-4 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01869-4
  42. McLaren, S., & Rowe, L. (2025). “You’re right to be skeptical!”: The Role of Legal Information Professionals in Assessing Generative AI Outputs. LEGAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 25(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1472669625000052 DOI: 10.1017/S1472669625000052
  43. Mocanu, D. M. (2022). Gradient Legal Personhood for AI Systems-Painting Continental Legal Shapes Made to Fit Analytical Molds. FRONTIERS IN ROBOTICS AND AI, 8, 788179. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.788179 DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2021.788179
  44. Moneus, A. M., & Sahari, Y. (2024). Artificial intelligence and human translation: A contrastive study based on legal texts. Heliyon, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28106 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28106
  45. Mowbray, A., Chung, P., & Greenleaf, G. (2020). Utilising AI in the legal assistance sector-Testing a role for legal information institutes. COMPUTER LAW & SECURITY REVIEW, 38, 105407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105407 DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105407
  46. Murphy, J. (2023). AI in the Legal Sector—An Overview for Information Professionals. LEGAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 23(3), 150–153. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1472669623000373 DOI: 10.1017/S1472669623000373
  47. Neuwirth, R. J. (2024). Law, artificial intelligence, and synaesthesia. AI & SOCIETY, 39(3), 901–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01615-8 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-022-01615-8
  48. Novelli, C., Bongiovanni, G., & Sartor, G. (2022). A conceptual framework for legal personality and its application to AI. JURISPRUDENCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL AND POLITICAL THOUGHT, 13(2), 194–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2021.2010936 DOI: 10.1080/20403313.2021.2010936
  49. Okuno, M. J., & Okuno, H. G. (2025). Legal frameworks for AI service business participants: A comparative analysis of liability protection across jurisdictions. AI & SOCIETY. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02288-9 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.5170869
  50. Orlando, A. (2022). AI for Sport in the EU Legal Framework. 2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SPORT TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH (IEEE STAR 2022), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1109/STAR53492.2022.9860029 DOI: 10.1109/STAR53492.2022.9860029
  51. Palmirani, M. (2022). A Smart Legal Order for the Digital Era: A Hybrid AI and Dialogic Model. RAGION PRATICA, 59(2), 633–656.
  52. Palmirani, M., Sovrano, F., Liga, D., Sapienza, S., & Vitali, F. (2021). Hybrid AI Framework for Legal Analysis of the EU Legislation Corrigenda. In E. Schweighofer (Ed.), LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (Vol. 346, pp. 68–75). Ios Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA210319 DOI: 10.3233/FAIA210319
  53. Parycek, P., Schmid, V., & Novak, A.-S. (2024). Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Automation in Administrative Procedures: Potentials, Limitations, and Framework Conditions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(2), 8390–8415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01433-3 DOI: 10.1007/s13132-023-01433-3
  54. Prakash, G. A., & Nair, V. (2024). Integrating Generative AI into Legal Education: From Casebooks to Code, Opportunities and Challenges. LAW TECHNOLOGY AND HUMANS, 6(3), 60–79. https://doi.org/10.5204/lthj.3640 DOI: 10.5204/lthj.3640
  55. Regulation—EU - 2024/1689—EN - EUR-Lex. (n.d.). Retrieved July 5, 2025, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng
  56. Roman, D., & Natalia, P. (2019). Artificial Intelligence Legal Policy: Limits of Use of Some Kinds of AI. 2019 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER APPLICATIONS (ICSCA 2019), 343–346. https://doi.org/10.1145/3316615.3316627 DOI: 10.1145/3316615.3316627
  57. Roussos, M., & Hajduk, P. (2025). Harnessing AI for AML/CFT: Legal Grounds for Training AI on Personal Data for AML/CFT under EU Data Protection Law. INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY LAW. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2025.2510748 DOI: 10.1080/13600834.2025.2510748
  58. Sachan, S., & Liu (Lisa), X. (2024). Blockchain-based auditing of legal decisions supported by explainable AI and generative AI tools. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 129, 107666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107666 DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107666
  59. Secretariat, T. B. of C. (2024, May 30). Responsible use of artificial intelligence in government. https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/digital-government/digital-government-innovations/responsible-use-ai.html
  60. Sipior, J. C., Ward, B. T., Rusinko, C. A., & Lombardi, D. R. (2024). Bias in Using AI for Recruiting: Legal Considerations. INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 41(4), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2023.2294453 DOI: 10.1080/10580530.2023.2294453
  61. Solaiman, B. (2024). Legal and Ethical Considerations of Artificial Intelligence for Residents in Post-Acute and Long-Term Care. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 25(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105105 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105105
  62. Terzidou, K. (2025). Generative AI systems in legal practice offering quality legal services while upholding legal ethics. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW IN CONTEXT. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552325000047 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.5197274
  63. Uddin, M., Chowdhury, A., & Kabir, M. A. (2024). Legal and ethical aspects of deploying artificial intelligence in climate-smart agriculture. AI & SOCIETY, 39(1), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01421-2 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-022-01421-2
  64. Unver, M. B. (2023). Rebuilding “ethics” to govern AI: How to re-set the boundaries for the legal sector? PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAW, ICAIL 2023, 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1145/3594536.3595156 DOI: 10.1145/3594536.3595156
  65. van Hilten, M., Ryan, M., Blok, V., & de Roo, N. (2025). Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects (ELSA) for AI: An assessment tool for Agri-food. SMART AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY, 10, 100710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2024.100710 DOI: 10.1016/j.atech.2024.100710
  66. Vayadande, K., Bhat, A., Bachhav, P., Bhoyar, A., Charoliya, Z., & Chavan, A. (2024). AI-Powered Legal Documentation Assistant. 2024 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PERVASIVE COMPUTING AND SOCIAL NETWORKING, ICPCSN 2024, 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPCSN62568.2024.00022 DOI: 10.1109/ICPCSN62568.2024.00022
  67. Vochozka, M., & Kunju Mol Raj, R. (2025). Framing Justice: A Sentiment Analysis of Law and Responsibility in Contemporary News Discourse. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-025-10365-x DOI: 10.1007/s11196-025-10365-x
  68. Vochozka, M., Maska, J., & Kovac, V. (2023). Role of due diligence in business takeover. Ekonomia I Prawo-Economics and Law, 22(3), 635–654. https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2023.034 DOI: 10.12775/EiP.2023.034
  69. Voudouris, N., Patrikakis, C., Sancin, V., & Matei, S. A. (2024). Legal and Ethical Dimensions in Addressing Human Rights in the Design and Implementation of Artificial Intelligence. In M. Farmanbar, M. Tzamtzi, A. K. Verma, & A. Chakravorty (Eds.), Frontiers of Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, and Multidisciplinary Applications (pp. 409–415). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9836-4_30 DOI: 10.1007/978-981-99-9836-4_30
  70. White Paper on Artificial Intelligence: A European approach to excellence and trust - European Commission. (n.d.). Retrieved July 5, 2025, from https://commission.europa.eu/publications/white-paper-artificial-intelligence-european-approach-excellence-and-trust_en
  71. Wojtczak, S. (2022). Endowing Artificial Intelligence with legal subjectivity. AI & SOCIETY, 37(1), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01147-7 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-021-01147-7
  72. Zhang, C., & Meng, Y. (2024). Bayesian deep learning: An enhanced AI framework for legal reasoning alignment. COMPUTER LAW & SECURITY REVIEW, 55, 106073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106073 DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106073