VSTE

ISSN (online): 1805-9112

Open access

Analysis of the relationship between selected renewable energy and non-renewable resources

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to determine the dependence between the installed capacity of wind power plants and annual CO2 production, as well as between coal energy use and CO2 production. Pearson and Spearman correlation methods are used for the analysis based on the normality of data, which was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test of normality. The results show a negative correlation between the capacity of wind power plants and CO2 production in Belarus, Russia, and Norway, while in Spain and Germany, the correlation is positive. Furthermore, a positive correlation between coal energy use and CO2 production is found in the Czech Republic, Poland, Austria, Portugal, Italy, Greece, and Denmark, which aligns with expectations. Conversely, a negative correlation is found in Ireland and Lithuania, which may indicate more efficient energy use. Limitations are identified in the form of different correlation tests, which may partially distort the results. This work contributes to research in the field of energy and can be useful for the development of political and energy plans.

Keywords:Wind energyangular energyrenewable energynon-renewable energyCO2

References

  1. ABDALLAH, L., EL-SHENNAWY, T. 2020. Evaluation of CO2 emission from Egypt's future power plants. Euro-Mediterranean Journal for Environmental Integration, 5(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-020-00184-w
  2. ALNEMER, H. A., HKIRI, B., TISSAOUI, K. 2023. Dynamic impact of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on CO2 emission and economic growth in Saudi Arabia: Fresh evidence from wavelet coherence analysis. Renewable Energy, 209, 340–356.
  3. AMER, E. A. A. A. et al. 2024. Impacts of renewable and disaggregated non-renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions in GCC countries: A STIRPAT model analysis. Heliyon, 10(9).
  4. APERGIS, N. et al. 2023. Investigating the association among CO2 emissions, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in Uzbekistan: An ARDL approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(14), 39666–39679.
  5. ASIF, M., NAWAZ, S., KHAN, M. 2022. Hybrid energy systems: A step forward towards energy sustainability. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 153, 111–132. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112150
  6. BALCILAR, M., USMAN, O., IKE, G. N. 2023. Operational behaviours of multinational corporations, renewable energy transition, and environmental sustainability in Africa: Does the level of natural resource rents matter? Resources Policy, 81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103344
  7. BALI SWAIN, R., KARIMU, A., GRÅD, E. 2022. Sustainable development, renewable energy transformation and employment impact in the EU. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 29(8), 695–708. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2078902
  8. BOEHRINGER, C., RUTHERFORD, T. F., SANDSMARK, M. 2020. The economic and environmental benefits of renewable energy. Energy Economics, 87, 104725. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104725
  9. BOZKAYA, Ş., ONIFADE, S. T., DURAN, M. S., KAYA, M. G. 2022. Does environmentally friendly energy consumption spur economic progress: Empirical evidence from the Nordic countries? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(54), 82600–82610. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23452-4
  10. CHOWDHURY, A. T., ISLAM, S., ROY, S. 2021. Technological advancements in renewable energy storage systems: A review. Energy Reports, 7, 902–915. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.07.012
  11. HU, Y., YOU, M., LIU, G., DONG, Z. 2021. Characteristics and potential ecological risks of heavy metal pollution in surface soil around coal-fired power plant. Environmental Earth Sciences, 80(17). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09887-x
  12. HUSSAIN, H., MAHMUD, S., AHMAD, Z. 2023. Renewable energy and energy security: The role of solar and wind energy in stabilizing energy markets. Energy Policy, 169, 113195. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113195
  13. IQBAL, S., WANG, Y., SHAIKH, P. A., MAQBOOL, A., HAYAT, K. 2022. Exploring the asymmetric effects of renewable energy production, natural resources, and economic progress on CO2 emissions: Fresh evidence from Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(5), 7067–7078. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16138-w
  14. KAFFINE, D. T., MCBEE, B. J., ERICSON, S. J. 2020. Intermittency and CO2 reductions from wind energy. The Energy Journal, 41(5), 23–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.41.5.dkaf
  15. KUANG, Z., CHEN, Q., YU, Y. 2022. Assessing the CO2-emission risk due to wind-energy uncertainty. Applied Energy, 310. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118615
  16. KUO, Y., MANEENGAM, A., PHAN THE, C., BINH AN, N., NASSANI, A. A. et al. 2022. Fresh evidence on environmental quality measures using natural resources, renewable energy, non-renewable energy and economic growth for 10 Asian nations from CS-ARDL technique. Fuel, 320. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123914
  17. LI, B., HANEKLAUS, N. 2021. The impact of fossil fuel consumption and renewable energy on CO2 emissions in China: An asymmetric analysis. Sustainable Development, 29(5), 706–718. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2366
  18. LI, B., HANEKLAUS, N. 2021. The role of renewable energy, fossil fuel consumption, urbanization and economic growth on CO2 emissions in China. Energy Reports, 7, 783–791. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.09.194
  19. MACLAURIN, G., HEIN, C., WILLIAMS, T., ROBERTS, O., LANTZ, E. et al. 2022. National-scale impacts on wind energy production under curtailment scenarios to reduce bat fatalities. Wind Energy, 25(9), 1514–1529. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2741
  20. MAJEED, Y., KHAN, M. U., WASEEM, M., ZAHID, U., MAHMOOD, F. et al. 2023. Renewable energy as an alternative source for energy management in agriculture. Energy Reports, 10, 344–359. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.06.032
  21. NI, X., WANG, Z., AKBAR, A., ALI, S. 2022. Natural resources volatility, renewable energy, R&D resources and environment: Evidence from selected developed countries. Resources Policy, 77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102655
  22. RAJBHANDARI, R., SHRESTHA, S., KHATRI, P. 2023. Global cooperation for renewable energy development: A case study of the South Asian region. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 15(1), 013202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0090247
  23. SHAHBAZ, M., RAGHUTLA, C., ARIF, I. 2022. The dynamic links between renewable energy, technological innovation, and CO2 emissions: Insights from advanced panel techniques. Journal of Cleaner Production, 370, 133333. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133333
  24. SIMONSEN, M., AALL, C., WALNUM, H. J., SOVACOOL, B. K. 2022. Effective policies for reducing household energy use: Insights from Norway. Applied Energy, 318. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119201
  25. THAKURI, S., KHATRI, S. B., THAPA, S. 2021. Enflamed CO2 emissions from cement production in Nepal. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(48), 68762–68772. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15347-7
  26. YILDIRIM, E., ONAY, O., ADAR, H. 2023. International trade and renewable energy: A pathway to global energy transition. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 169, 112979. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112979
  27. ZHANG, C. H., SEARS, L., MYERS, J. V., BROCK, G. N., SEARS, C. G. et al. 2022. Proximity to coal-fired power plants and neurobehavioral symptoms in children. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 32(1), 124–134. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-021-00369-7
  28. ZHANG, P., YANG, M., LAN, J., HUANG, Y., ZHANG, J. et al. 2023. Water quality degradation due to heavy metal contamination: Health impacts and eco-friendly approaches for heavy metal remediation. Toxics, 11(10). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11100828