VSTE

ISSN (online): 1805-9112

Research ArticleOpen access

Organizational culture of military institutions with regard to the gender aspects: A systematic review

Abstract

The values, norms, attitudes, and symbols within military organizations have traditionally been somewhat aligned with masculine traits. The aim of this paper is to investigate the precise manifestations of masculinity within the organizational culture of military institutions and to compare it with formal efforts and politics. The systematic review identified existing peer-reviewed literature in English or Czech in two electronic databases - Web of Science and Scopus. It was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The results confirm the expectation that, despite formal instruments and standards supporting gender equality, the military is an organization still strongly based on masculine characteristics and associated with values and norms traditionally attributed to men. Nevertheless, in line with broader societal movements toward gender equality, there is some evidence of an attempt to integrate feminine aspects into the organizational culture of military institutions.

Keywords:Organizational culturemilitarygendergender equalitysystematic review

References

  1. Alfred, G. C., Hammer, J. H., GOOD G. E (2014). Male student veterans: Hardiness, psychological well-being, and masculine norms. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 15(1), 95–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031450
  2. Alvinius, A., Holmberg, A (2023). Blaming and shaming in the shadow structure: individual resistance towards gender equality work as expressions of social conflict. Feminist Media Studies, 23(1), 83-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1973062
  3. Arkin, W., DOBROFSKY L. R (1978). Military socialization and masculinity. Journal of Social Issues, 34(1), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1978.tb02546.x
  4. Atzori, M., Lombardi, L., Fraccaroli, F., Battistelli, A (2008). Organizational socialization of women in the Italian Army. Journal of Workplace Learning, 20(5), 327-347. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620810882932
  5. BAEK S., SKJELSBAEK I., 2O23. The Women, peace, and security norms as seen by Norwegian male officers. Nordic journal of working life studies, 13(2), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.135624
  6. Boldry, J., WOOD, W (2001). Gender stereotypes and the evaluation of men and women in military training. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 689–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00236
  7. BROWNE K. R (2012). Band of brothers or band of siblings?: An evolutionary perspective on sexual integration of combat forces. In: SHACKELFORD T. K., WEEKES-SHAckelford V. (eds), Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Violence, Homicide, and War. Oxford: Oxford Library.
  8. CARREIRAS, H (2006). Gender and the Military: Women in the Armed Forces of Western Democracies. London. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-203-96903-8
  9. Carreiras, H (2010). Gendered culture in peacekeeping operations. International Peacekeeping, 17(4), 471-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2010.516655
  10. Collins-Dogru, J., ULRICH J. R (2017). Fighting stereotypes: Public discourse about women in combat. Armed Forces & Society. 44(3), 436-459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X17715650
  11. CONNELL R. W (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.
  12. Dahl, G. B., Kotsadam, A., Dan-Olof, R (2018). Does integration change gender attitudes? The effect of randomly assigning women to traditionally male teams. IZA Discussion Paper, 11323, [accessed: 2023-11-1]. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3129267 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3129267
  13. DAVISA K. D (2022). Socio-cultural dynamics in gender and military contexts: Seeking and understanding change. Journal of Military, Veteran and Family Health. 8. 66-74. https://doi.org/10.3138/jmvfh-2021-0088
  14. Egnell, R., Hojem, P., Berts, H (2014). Gender, Military Effectiveness, and Organizational Change: The Swedish Model. London: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-137-38504-8
  15. ELSHTAIN J. B (1995). Women and war. New York: Basic Books. ISBN 0-226-20626-2
  16. Ellingsen, D., LILLEAAS U-B., Kimmel, M (2016). Something is working—But why? Mixed rooms in the Norwegian army, Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 24(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2016.1236037
  17. Epstein, Y., Yanovich, R., Moran, D. S., Heled, Y (2013). Physiological employment standards IV: Integration of women in combat units physiological and medical considerations. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 113(11), 2673-2690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-012-2558-7
  18. FERNANDEZ-OSORIO A. E., MIRON M., CABRERA-CABRERA L. J. CORCIONE-NIETO M. A.,
  19. VILLALBA-GARCIA L. F (2023). Towards an effective gender integration in the armed forces: The case of the Colombian Army Military Academy. World Development, 171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106348
  20. Golan, G (1997). Militarization and gender: the Israeli experience. Women's Studies International Forum, 20(5/6), 581-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(97)00063-0
  21. Green, G., Emslie, C., O’neill, D., Hunt, K., Walker, S (2010). Exploring the ambiguities of masculinity in accounts of emotional distress in the military among young ex-servicemen. Social Science & Medicine, 71(8), 1480-1488, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.07.015
  22. Heinecken, L (2017). Conceptualizing the Tensions Evoked by Gender Integration in the Military: The South African Case. Armed Forces & Society, 43(2), 202-220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X16670692
  23. HERBERT M. S (1998). Camouflage isn't only for combat. Gender, sexuality, and women in the military. New York: New York University Press. ISBN 978-0814735480
  24. HIGATE P. R (2003). Military masculinities: Identity and the state. Ann Arbor. Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN 978-0-275-97558-6
  25. Holmberg, A., Alvinius, A (2023). Organizational resistance through organizing principles: the case of gender equality in the military. Gender in Management, https://doi.org/10.1108/GM- 05-2022-0180
  26. Jakupcak, M., PRIMACK, J. M., SOLIMEO S. L (2017). Introduction to the special issue examining the implications of masculinity within military and veteran populations. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 18(3), 191–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000126
  27. Karazi-Presler, T., Sasson-Levy, O., Lomsky-Feder, E (2018). Gender, emotions management, and power in organizations: The case of israeli women junior military officers. Sex Roles, 78, 573– 586, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0810-7
  28. King, A (2016). The female combat soldier. European Journal of International Relations, 22(1), 122– 143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066115581909
  29. Kronsell, A (2005). Gendered practices in institutions of hegemonic masculinity. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7(2), 280-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740500065170
  30. Lakika, D., Palmary, I (2022). How can you call her a woman? Male soldiers’ views on women in the DRC Armed Forces. Peace and Conflict Studies, 29(1), [accessed: 2023-11-1]. Available from: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/pcs/vol29/iss1/2
  31. Lombardo, E., MERGAERT, L (2013). Gender mainstreaming and resistance to gender training. a framework for studying implementation. Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 21(4), 296-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2013.851115
  32. Lorber, W., Garcia, H (2010). Not supposed to feel this: Traditional masculinity in psychotherapy with male veterans returning from Afghanistan and Iraq. Psychotherapy Theory Research Practice Training, 47(3), 296-305. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021161
  33. LUKASOVA R., NOVY I. et al., 2004. Organizační kultura. Od sdílených hodnot a cílů k vyšší výkonnosti podniku. Praha. Grada Publishing. 2004. [accessed: 2023-11-1]. Available from: https://books.google.cz/books?id=03zOwCZ3WwUC&printsec=frontcover&key=AIzaSyDlPfI89J dFhWBVsMVsavVo6aNh057xlTc#v=onepage&q&f=false )
  34. MALHEIRO L., BESSA F., REIS J. 2023. Exploring gender perspectives among gendarmerie and army cadets at the portuguese military academy: a comprehensive Analysis. Sexuality & Culture. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-023-10137-4
  35. MARLOWE D. H (1983). The manning of the force and the structure of battle: Part 2—men and women. In Fullinwider R. K. (ed.), Conscripts and volunteers: Military requirements, social justice, and the all-volunteer force. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld. McCALLISTER L., CALLAGHAN J. E. M, FELLIN L. C., 2018. Masculinities and emotional expression in UK servicemen: ‘Big boys don’t cry’? Journal of Gender Studies, 28(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2018.1429898
  36. McSALLY M. E., 2023. Defending America in mixed company: Gender in the U.S. armed forces. Daedalus. [accessed: 2023-11-1]. Available from: http://direct.mit.edu/daed/article- pdf/140/3/148/1829944/daed_a_00105.pdf
  37. Mitchell, B (1998). Women in the military: Flirting with disaster. Washington DC: Regnery Publishing. ISBN 0-89526-376-9
  38. Mokua, O (2015a). Crossing gender boundaries or challenging masculinities? Female combatants in the kenya defense forces’ (KDF) War against Al-Shabaab Militants. Masculinities and Social Change, 4(2), 163-185. https://doi.org/10.17583/msc.2015.1510
  39. Mokua, O (2015b). Feminine masculinities in the military. African Security Review, 24(4), 403-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2015.1099339
  40. Nicolas, A (2014). Women in military are hurt by the bigotry of low expectations so help them by holding them to standards of excellence. Foreign Policy. [accessed: 2023-11-1]. Available from: http://foreignpolicy.com/2014/09/04/women-in-military-are-hurt-by-the-bigotry-of- lowexpectations-sohelp-them-by-holding-them-to-standards-of-excellence/
  41. Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., Elmagarmid, A (2016). Rayyan: a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst. Rev. 5, 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
  42. PAGE M. J., MOHER D., BOSSUYT P. M., BOUTRON I., HOFFMANN T. C., MULROW C. D., et al., 2021. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372, n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
  43. Persson, A., Sundevall, F (2019). Conscripting women: gender, soldiering, and military service in Sweden 1965–2018. Women's History Review, 28(7), 1039-1056. https://doi.org/10.1080/09612025.2019.1596542
  44. Pettersson, L., Persson, A., BERGGREN A. W (2008). Changing gender relations: Women officers’ experiences in the Swedish armed forces. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 29(2), 192-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X07088541
  45. Reis, J., Menezes, S (2020). Gender inequalities in the military service: A systematic literature review. Sexuality & Culture, 24,1004–1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09662-y
  46. Richard, K., MOLLOY, S (2020). An examination of emerging adult military men: Masculinity and U.S. military climate. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 21(4), 686–698. https://doi.org/10.1037/ men0000303
  47. Rokvić, V., Stanarević, S (2016). Toward gender and LGBT equality in the Serbian armed forces. Women's Studies International Forum, 55, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2016.02.003
  48. Sasson-Levy, O (2003). Feminism and military gender practices: Israeli women soldiers in “masculine” roles. Sociological Inquiry, 73(3), 440–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475- 682X.00064
  49. Sasson-Levy, O (2008). Individual bodies, collective state interests: The case of Israeli combat soldiers. Men and Masculinities, 10(3), 296–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X06287760.
  50. SCHAEFER, H. S., Bigelman, K. A., GIST N. H. LERNER R. M (2021a). But how many push-ups can she do? The influence of sexism on peer ratings in a military setting. Personality and Individual Differences, 177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110805
  51. Schaefer, H. S., Cotting, D. I., Proctor, E. S., Ryan, D. M., LERNER R. M (2021b). The military hypermasculine mystique: Sex, status, and emotional control at the United States Military Academy. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 22(4), 611–626. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000365
  52. SCHEIN, E. H (1985). Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  53. SCHEIN, E. H (1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers, ISBN 1-55542-487-2
  54. Shahrabani, S., Garyn-Tal, S (2019). The impact of prior combat military service on Israeli women's self-efficacy and risk attitudes. Women's Studies International Forum, 74, 143-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2019.03.012
  55. Svop, C (2021). Juggling risks: Towards a safe and inclusive work environment for pregnant soldiers in the Danish army. Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, 4(1), 220–231. https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.102
  56. Tarrasch, R., Lurie, O., Yanovich, R., Moran, D (2011). Psychological aspects of the integration of women into combat roles. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 305–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.014
  57. Tidy, J (2018). Fatherhood, Gender, and interventions in the geopolitical: Analyzing paternal peace, masculinities, and war. International Political Sociology, 12(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/ olx025
  58. Trut, V., Hozo, E. R., Mladovcić, B (2023). Determinants of attitudes toward women in the military. Sociologija i prostor: časopis za istraživanje prostornoga i sociokulturnog razvoja, 1(226), 197-222. https://doi.org/10.5673/sip.61.1.9
  59. VAN DOUWEN N., VAN DEN BRINK M. C. L., Benschop, Y (2022). Badass marines: Resistance practices against the introduction of women in the Dutch military. Gender Work and Organization, 29(1), https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12835
  60. West, H, Antrobus, S (2023). Deeply odd’: women veterans as critical feminist scholars. Critical Military Studies, 9(1), 24-39, https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2021.1907020
  61. Zdravkovic, M., Osinova, D., Prielipp, R., Simoes, C. M., Berger-Estilita, J (2020). Perceptions of gender equity in departmental leadership, research opportunities, and clinical work attitudes: an international survey of 11 781 anaesthesiologists. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 124(3): 160- 170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.12.022