VSTE
Littera Scripta

ISSN (online): 1805-9112

Research ArticleOpen access

Specification of product value as a key part of Canvas business model in the context of industry 4.0

Petra Domanižová1, Nikola Janíčková2, František Milichovský1

  1. Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Business and Management, Department of Management
  2. Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Business and Management, Department of Finance

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to specify the business model Canvas and its modifications in the manufacturing industry 4.0. The paper provides a review of the literature to expand our knowledge of how Industry 4.0 affects business models. This article aims to specify and analyze the Canvas business model and its application in the new revolutionary era of the digital world in manufacturing 4.0. Also, we defined the hypothesis that "exist a relationship between market type such specific market segment) and given value to the customer". The findings deepen the understanding of how 4.0 affects the manufacturing industry, B.M., and the behavior of the current economic environment. A lot of research in the field of industry 4.0 using Canvas B.M., but very often, the view of the Czech business environment is neglected. Focusing on this area may lead to future research. This literary review focuses on the latest literature indexed in the Web of Science and Scopus. The focus is on the period of 2013-2020. The research methodology is based on a comparison of research by other authors with a focus on industry 4.0 in the Czech Republic and worldwide, on the role of business models in this sector, and their interconnection. The main results of this research point to the importance of Industry 4.0 and its implementation, as well as the need to adapt business models to the needs of this revolution.

Keywords:business modelsCanvas business modelLean Canvas key performance indicatorsmanufacturing industryindustry 4.0Czech Republic digitizationIndustry 4.0.

References

  1. BASL, J., (2017). A pilot study of the readiness of Czech companies to implement the principles of Industry 4.0. Management and Production Engineering Review, 8(2), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1515/per 2017-0012.
  2. CONFEDERATION OF INDUSTRY OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC, (2019). Industry 4.0. https://www.spcr.cz/prumysl-4-0.
  3. EMATINGER, R., (2017). Von der Industrie 4.0 zum Geschäftsmodell 4.0: Chancen der digitalen Transformation. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
  4. EUROPEAN UNION, (2015). Industry 4.0: Digitalization for productivity and growth. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2015/568337 /EPRS_BRI(2015)568337_EN.pdf.
  5. FETTIG, K., T. GAČIĆ, A. KÖSKAL, A. KÜHN and F. STUBER, (2018). Impact of industry 4.0 on organizational structures. IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), Stuttgart, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.(2018).8436284
  6. IBARRA, D., J. GANZARAIN and J. I. IGARTUA, (2018). Business model innovation through Industry 4.0: A review. Procedia Manufacturing, 22, 4-10. 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.002.
  7. JANÍČKOVÁ, N. and O. ŽIŽLAVSKÝ, (2020). Klíčové ukazatele výkonnosti pro malé a střední nevýrobní podniky, operující v automobilovém průmyslu – předvýzkum. Business Trends, 10(2), 36-47. 10.24132/jbt.2020.10.2.36-47
  8. KERZNER, H., (2011). Project management metrics, KPIs, and dashboards: A guide to measuring and monitoring project performance. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  9. KOPP, J. and J. BASL, (2017). Study of the readiness of Czech companies to industry 4.0. Journal of Systems Integration, 3, 40-45. https://doi.org/10.20470/jsi.v8i2.313.
  10. KOREN, Y. and M. SHPITALNI, (2010). Design of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 29(4), 130-141. 10.1016/j.jmsy.(2011).01.001
  11. MAN, J. C. and J. O. STRANDHAGEN, (2017). An Industry 4.0 research agenda for sustainable business models. Procedia CIRP, 63, 721-726. 10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.315
  12. NAYAK, N. G., F. DÜRR and K. ROTHERMEL, (2015). Software-defined environment for reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Internet of Things (IoT), 5th International Conference on the Seoul, 122-129.
  13. OSTERWALDER, A., Y. PIGNEUR and T. CLARK, (2012). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  14. PARMENTER, D., (2010). Key performance indicator: Developing, implementing and using winning KPIs. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  15. SAMSONOWA, T., P. BUXMANN and W. GERTEIS, (2009). Defining KPI sets of industrial research organizations – A performance measurement approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(2), 157-176. ISSN 1363-9196.
  16. TECHNODAT, (2018). Industry 4.0. https://www.prumysl-4.cz/.
  17. ZAHERAWATI, Z., A. Y. MAHAZRIL, Y. ZURAINI, N. NAZNI, M. S. MOHD ZOOL HILMIE and Z. ZURIAWATI, (2011). Key performance indicators (KPIs) in the public sector: A study in Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 7(7), 102-107. ISSN (1911)-2017.