An evaluation of Visegrad group business environment
Abstract
Evaluation of the business environment and enterprises is a key element of the economic success of countries. The Doing Business indicator issued by the World Bank is used to characterize the business environment and compare the economies of over 190 countries. The present paper is focusing to examine and compare the selected indicators of Visegrad 4 countries in order to obtain information about the position of the countries in relation to one another. The aim of this study is to assess the economic situation of the V4 countries (Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland) based on the Doing Business research and examine the changes in the past five years. The chosen indicators to be examined and compared are the indicator starting a business, paying taxes, getting credit and resolving insolvency.
References
- BACHER H. U., BRÜLHART M., (2013). Progressive taxes and firm births. International Tax and Public Finance, 20(1), 129–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797–012–9218-z
- BELAS J., GAVUROVA B., CEPEL M., KUBAK M. (2020). Evaluation of economic potential of business environment development by comparing sector differences: perspective of SMEs in Czech Republic and Slovakia. Oeconomia Copernicana, 11(1), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2020.006
- BRAUNERHJELM, EKLUND J. E., THULIN, (2021). Taxes, the tax administrative burden and the entrepreneurial life cycle. Small Business Economics, 56(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187–019–00195–0
- CHOWDHURY F., TERJESEN S., AUDRETSCH D., (2015). Varieties of entrepreneurship: institutional drivers across entrepreneurial activity and country. European Journal of Law and Economics, 40(1),121–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657–014–9464-x
- DJANKOV S., HART O., MCLIESH C., SHLEIFER A., (2008). Debt Enforcement around the World. Journal of Political Economy, 116(6), 1105–49. https://doi.org/10.1086/595015
- DREHER A., GASSEBNER M., (2013). Greasing the Wheels of Entrepreneurship? The Impact of Regulations and Corruption on Firm Entry. Public Choice, 155(3), 412–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127–011–9871–2
- DUDIĆ, Z., DUDIĆ, B., AGBABA, B., NOSKOVÁ, M. (2020). The importance and application of the balanced scorecard model in enterprises. Acta Oeconomica Universitatis Selye 9(1): 45–56. https://doi.org/10.36007/Acta.2020.9.1.3
- FABUS M., (2018). Business environment analysis based on the Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) and Doing Business (DB): Case study Slovakia. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues. 7(4), 831–839. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2018.7.4(18).
- FABUS, M., DUDAS, T., CIHELKOVA, E. (2021). Business environment analysis based on the Doing Business: case study Slovakia. Insights into Regional Development 3(3): 56–65. https://doi.org/10.9770/IRD.2021.3.3(3)
- FONSECA R., LOPEZ-GARCIA, PISSARIDES C. A., (2001). Entrepreneurship, Start-up Costs and Employment. European Economic Review, 45(4–6), 692–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014–2921(01)00131–3
- HAMBUR J., LA CAVA G., (2018). Do Interest Rates Affect Business Investment? Evidence from Australian Company-level Data. RBA Research Discussion Papers rdp2018–05, Reserve Bank of Australia.
- HERRENDORF B., TEIXEIRA A., (2011). Barriers to Entry and Development. International Economic Review, 52(2), 573–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468–2354.2011.00639.x
- HRIVNAK, M., MORITZ, (2021). The availability of educated human capital in regions and the development of small and medium- sized enterprises. Acta Oeconomica Universitatis Selye 10(1): 40–53. https://doi.org/10.36007/Acta.2021.10.1.4
- JEAN VASILE A., CHIVU L., GHEORGHE I. G., GRUBOR A., SEDLARSKI T., SIMA V., SUBIC J., VASIC M., (2021). Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, Business Demography and European Socio-Economic Model: Does the Paradigm Really Converge? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(2), 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14020064
- KLAPPER L., LAEVEN L., RAJAN R., (2006). Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics, 82(3), 591–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.09.006
- KOTASKOVA A., LAZANYI K., AMOAH J., BELAS J., (2020). Financial risk management in the V4 Countries’ SMEs segment. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 17(4), 228–240. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(4).2020.21
- KOZUBÍKOVÁ L., HOMOLKA L., KRISTALAS D., (2017). The Effect of Business Environment and Entrepreneurs’ Gender on Perception of Financial Risk in The SMEs Sector. Journal of Competitiveness, 9(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2017.01.03
- KUMAR C. N., (2012). Trade Facilitation Concerns in South Asia: The Case of Selected Agro-Food Industries. In: Prospects of Regional Economic Cooperation in South Asia with Special Studies on Indian Industry, Chandos Asian Stud, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978–1–84334–614–2.50007–9.
- LEONAVIČIENĖ, E., BURINSKIENĖ, A. (2021). Research on the reflection of cultural dimensions in international business. Insights into Regional Development 3(4): 101–114. https://doi.org/10.9770/IRD.2021.3.4(7)
- POSCHKE M., (2010). The Regulation of Entry and Aggregate Productivity. The Economic Journal, 120(549), 1175–1200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468–0297.2010.02367.x
- RAHMAN A., ROZSA Z., CEPEL M., (2018). Trade Credit and Bank Finance – Evidence from the Visegrad Group. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(3), 132–148. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2018.03.09
- RUIZ F., CABELLO J., GLADISH B., (2017). Building Ease-of-Doing-Business synthetic indicators using a double reference point approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 131, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.005.
- SVOBODOVÁ L., HEDVICAKOVA M., (2015). Doing Business in the Countries of Visegrad Group. Procedia Economics and Finance, 34, 453–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212–5671(15)01654–8.
- WORLD BANK, (2019). Doing Business 2019, World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 30438, December.
- ZSIGMOND, T., MACHOVA R., ZSIGMONDOVA, A. (2021). Strategic management from the perspective of SMEs operating in service sector. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 25(2), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v25i2.1549