Skip to content
Littera Scripta
Menu
  • About journal
  • Ethics and Publication Ethics Policy
  • Editorial board
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Publication fees (APC)
  • Waiver policy
  • Open Access Policy
  • Peer Review Policy
  • Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy
  • Contact
Menu

Efficiency versus inequality: a computational and bibliometric analysis of law and political economy scholarship

1* Marek VOCHOZKA, 2J Meena MAHESWARI

Abstract: This study provides a large-scale empirical comparison between Law & Economics (LE) and Law & Political Economy (LPE) scholarship using computational text analysis techniques. Drawing on 405 publications indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection between 2010 and 2025, the study investigates whether LE and LPE represent conceptually distinct intellectual traditions characterized by different discourse orientations and thematic structures. The research integrates bibliometric analysis, Natural Language Processing (NLP), TF-IDF analysis, topic modeling, econometric modeling, and machine learning classification techniques to evaluate the divergence between the two scholarly frameworks. The findings reveal that LE scholarship remains strongly associated with efficiency-oriented discourse emphasizing markets, incentives, liability systems, and institutional optimization, whereas LPE scholarship demonstrates significantly stronger politically oriented discourse centered on governance, institutional power, social structures, and distributive concerns. Topic modeling results further confirm substantial thematic divergence between the two traditions. The econometric analysis demonstrates that LPE scholarship is significantly associated with higher politically oriented discourse and lower efficiency-oriented discourse. Robustness tests and logistic classification models additionally confirm the stability and computational distinguishability of the two intellectual traditions. Overall, the study contributes new empirical evidence to ongoing debates concerning the evolving relationship between law, economics, governance, and political power within contemporary legal scholarship.

Keywords: Law and Economics; Law and Political Economy; Computational Legal Analysis; Natural Language Processing; Legal Discourse Analysis.

JEL codes: K00; C55; D72

How to Cite This Article: Vochozka, M., & Maheswari, J. M. (2026).  Efficiency versus Inequality: A Computational and Bibliometric Analysis of Law and Political Economy Scholarship. Littera Scripta, 19(1), 13-35. https://doi.org/10.36708/LS.2026.I01.002

Read full text here

  • Current Issue

Archive

  • Littera Scripta 2026 (Volume 19)
    • 1/2026
  • Littera Scripta 2025 (Volume 18)
    • 2/2025
    • 1/2025
  • Littera Scripta 2024 (Volume 17)
    • 2/2024
    • 1/2024
  • Littera Scripta 2023 (Volume 16)
    • 2/2023
    • 1/2023
  • Littera Scripta 2022 (Volume 15)
    • 2/2022
    • 1/2022
  • Littera Scripta 2021 (Volume 14)
    • 1/2021
  • Littera Scripta 2020 (Volume 13)
    • 2/2020
    • 1/2020
  • Littera Scripta 2019 (Volume 12)
    • 2/2019
    • 1/2019
  • Littera Scripta 2018 (Volume 11)
    • 2/2018
    • 1/2018
  • Littera Scripta 2017 (Volume 10)
    • 2/2017
    • 1/2017
  • Littera Scripta 2016 (Volume 9)
    • 3/2016
    • 2/2016
    • 1/2016
  • Littera Scripta 2015 (Volume 8)
    • 2/2015
    • 1/2015
  • Littera Scripta 2014 (Volume 7)
    • 2/2014
    • 1/2014
  • Littera Scripta 2013 (Volume 6)
    • 2/2013
    • 1/2013
  • Littera Scripta 2012 (Volume 5)
    • 2/2012
    • 1/2012
  • Littera Scripta 2011 (Volume 4)
    • 2/2011
    • 1/2011
  • Littera Scripta 2010 (Volume 3)
    • 1-2/2010
© 2026 Littera Scripta | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme